Skip to content

Conversation

@jflo
Copy link
Contributor

@jflo jflo commented Oct 7, 2025

I think curating working groups requires more rigor than curating individual guild membership; it should at least require a quorum for participation and anonymizability of voters, as we have with quarterly updates.

jflo added 2 commits October 7, 2025 12:03
Define discussion period and DAO vote for working group adoption.
Added a link to the DAO documentation for clarity.
@jflo jflo marked this pull request as draft October 7, 2025 16:17
@rolfyone
Copy link
Collaborator

rolfyone commented Oct 8, 2025

it seems to me it should probably be similar to an election

  • talk about the change and get and understanding
  • have a vote - its effectively a constitution change when we're adding a group so its like a yes/no referendum really

im not sure if our dao allows votes like that? but it could be a good use...

After #400 it does appear its not really a 'PR' kind of topic to do changes like that, as it got pretty large across multiple media (discord, github pr)

@jflo jflo marked this pull request as ready for review January 13, 2026 19:02
@jflo
Copy link
Contributor Author

jflo commented Jan 13, 2026

Up for discussion is the degree of quorum necessary to pass a vote to add a new working group.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants