Skip to content

Conversation

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member

@jddarcy jddarcy commented Jan 10, 2026

The API note about comparing Element's:

The identity of an element involves implicit state not directly accessible from the element's methods, including state about the presence of unrelated types. Element objects created by different implementations of these interfaces should not be expected to be equal even if "the same" element is being modeled; this is analogous to the inequality of Class objects for the same class file loaded through different class loaders.

is equally applicable to comparing TypeMirror and an analagous note should be present on the methods used to compare TypeMirror's.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8374953: Add note on about implicit state when comparing TypeMirrors (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29153/head:pull/29153
$ git checkout pull/29153

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/29153
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/29153/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 29153

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 29153

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29153.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 10, 2026

👋 Welcome back darcy! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 10, 2026

@jddarcy This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8374953: Add note on about implicit state when comparing TypeMirrors

Reviewed-by: attila

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8374953: Add note on about implicit state when comparing TypeMirrors 8374953: Add note on about implicit state when comparing TypeMirrors Jan 10, 2026
@openjdk openjdk bot added the compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 10, 2026
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 10, 2026

@jddarcy The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 10, 2026
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 10, 2026

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@szegedi szegedi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clear and concise!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants