Update meta model picture

[RolandJentschETAS]

Update the meta model picture to the description and as well as to docs as code meta model

[github-actions]

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

[masc2023]

Did you update the text explaining the image accordingly?

[RolandJentschETAS]

Did you update the text explaining the image accordingly?

The process description describes it already in this way. Only the picture does not match. The interfaces were only visible in the process requirements section.

[masc2023]

Did you update the text explaining the image accordingly?

The process description describes it already in this way. Only the picture does not match. The interfaces were only visible in the process requirements section.

Would not agree, you add new boxes, interfaces, which are not described in the text, you changed line format, from dotted versus non-dotted, may some explanation, what that means would also help for understanding. Where are the real-interfaces? Any other box is missing?

[RolandJentschETAS]

Did you update the text explaining the image accordingly?

The process description describes it already in this way. Only the picture does not match. The interfaces were only visible in the process requirements section.

Would not agree, you add new boxes, interfaces, which are not described in the text, you changed line format, from dotted versus non-dotted, may some explanation, what that means would also help for understanding. Where are the real-interfaces? Any other box is missing?

That is also the case for the current picture. There are many things missing. No legend, and no explanation what the line style means and so on. I can add that in the future, but I want to first step fit the picture in any way to the reality.

Many boxes are missing. For example there are no tool requirements, aussumption of use requirements, logic_arc_int_op, mod_views, sw_unit interface.

For the real interfaces I'm not sure if this is really required or overengineering. For the general picture I think this is in any way to much.

[masc2023]

Did you update the text explaining the image accordingly?

The process description describes it already in this way. Only the picture does not match. The interfaces were only visible in the process requirements section.

Would not agree, you add new boxes, interfaces, which are not described in the text, you changed line format, from dotted versus non-dotted, may some explanation, what that means would also help for understanding. Where are the real-interfaces? Any other box is missing?

That is also the case for the current picture. There are many things missing. No legend, and no explanation what the line style means and so on. I can add that in the future, but I want to first step fit the picture in any way to the reality.

Many boxes are missing. For example there are no tool requirements, aussumption of use requirements, logic_arc_int_op, mod_views, sw_unit interface.

For the real interfaces I'm not sure if this is really required or overengineering. For the general picture I think this is in any way to

Then please add your complains to the image or text, so it is not forgotten and link to a Issue for a task as todo. The image by intention does not show anything, as it already to complex, e.g. tool requirements, as they are not part of software development. Assumptions of use are there, may not on platform level, as introduced later, so why not to add it now?

[RolandJentschETAS]

Did you update the text explaining the image accordingly?

The process description describes it already in this way. Only the picture does not match. The interfaces were only visible in the process requirements section.

Would not agree, you add new boxes, interfaces, which are not described in the text, you changed line format, from dotted versus non-dotted, may some explanation, what that means would also help for understanding. Where are the real-interfaces? Any other box is missing?

That is also the case for the current picture. There are many things missing. No legend, and no explanation what the line style means and so on. I can add that in the future, but I want to first step fit the picture in any way to the reality.
Many boxes are missing. For example there are no tool requirements, aussumption of use requirements, logic_arc_int_op, mod_views, sw_unit interface.
For the real interfaces I'm not sure if this is really required or overengineering. For the general picture I think this is in any way to

Then please add your complains to the image or text, so it is not forgotten and link to a Issue for a task as todo. The image by intention does not show anything, as it already to complex, e.g. tool requirements, as they are not part of software development. Assumptions of use are there, may not on platform level, as introduced later, so why not to add it now?

Add issue: #516