Skip to content

Conversation

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator

@kmontemayor2-sc kmontemayor2-sc commented Jan 13, 2026

Scope of work done

Doing this mainly so I can leverage the exact same logic for the GS integration test :P

We can't use this for the edges, as they are not guaranteed to be evenly balanced, as they are sharded by src node id.

Where is the documentation for this feature?: N/A

Did you add automated tests or write a test plan?

Updated Changelog.md? NO

Ready for code review?: NO

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unit_test_py

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/integration_test

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/e2e_test

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

GiGL Automation

@ 20:05:35UTC : 🔄 Python Unit Test started.

@ 21:11:58UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

GiGL Automation

@ 20:05:40UTC : 🔄 Integration Test started.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

GiGL Automation

@ 20:05:43UTC : 🔄 E2E Test started.

@ 21:28:57UTC : ❌ Workflow failed.
Please check the logs for more details.

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/unit_test_py

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/integration_test

@kmontemayor2-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/e2e_test

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

GiGL Automation

@ 23:55:11UTC : 🔄 Python Unit Test started.

@ 01:01:59UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

GiGL Automation

@ 23:55:16UTC : 🔄 Integration Test started.

@ 24:47:09UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 13, 2026

GiGL Automation

@ 23:55:18UTC : 🔄 E2E Test started.

@ 01:13:01UTC : ✅ Workflow completed successfully.

@kmontemayor2-sc kmontemayor2-sc changed the title test Add util to build balanced range partition book Jan 14, 2026
Copy link
Collaborator

@mkolodner-sc mkolodner-sc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks Kyle! Left a few small comments but generally LGTM

@kmontemayor2-sc kmontemayor2-sc marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2026 01:01
@kmontemayor2-sc kmontemayor2-sc added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 15, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 4e88d3d Jan 15, 2026
6 checks passed
@kmontemayor2-sc kmontemayor2-sc deleted the kmonte/add-range-pb-util branch January 15, 2026 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants